GOP bill would change WI child custody, support laws

Reporter Greg Naumann writes about Assembly Bill 540 at WI’s WKOW:

MADISON (WKOW) — Father’s rights groups are fighting to change the way courts rule in child custody and child support cases.  And they’ve gotten the attention of some Republican lawmakers.

Rep. Joel Kleefisch (R-Oconomowoc) authored Assembly Bill 540, which seeks to establish a presumption in the law that equal placement with each parent is in the best interest of a child after a divorce.

“Now, that doesn’t mean it has to be equal,” explained Keith Wessel, a family law attorney in Madison.  “The parents can do whatever they want and the court is not going to enter an order for equal placement if there are serious problems with either parent.”

Wessel says that’s already what happens in most custody cases, but there are exceptions.  He points to one of his clients that only got 36 percent custody of his child, despite being a stellar father.

“There was really no basis that I could determine why he should be confined to that amount.  And he ended up spending $15-20,000 on litigation to get 42 percent,” said Wessel.

“It’s not really in the best interest of children to have a one-size fits all statute that does say you must equalize, unless….,” countered Daphne Webb, a family law attorney with the Stafford Rosenbaum firm of Madison.

Webb not only questions the custody provision of the bill but also the portions that impact child support.  She says a provision that says the payment of health insurance premiums should count towards child support is problematic.

“There’s no corollary,” explained Webb.  “If the payee is providing the health insurance, there’s nothing in there that that person would get dollar for dollar reimbursement for what they’re paying for health insurance.”

Webb also has problems with a provision that would cap the income that is subject to child support payments at $150,000.

“Hey, if the boat is rising, the children’s boat should rise also along with the parent that has the good fortune to be making the money,” said Webb.

A final provision of the bill would require courts to revise a child support agreement, if the parent paying the support experiences a loss of income due to unforeseen circumstance like a loss of job or illness.

“I think it’s problematic that we’ve become bound to things that are unforeseeable,” said Wessel.

Rep. Kleefisch did not make himself available for comment on this story, but his spokesperson confirmed Kleefisch decided to author the legislation after meetings with several father’s rights groups, including Dads of Wisconsin.

The bill has been referred to the Assembly Committee on Family Law, but has yet to be scheduled for a public hearing.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to GOP bill would change WI child custody, support laws

  1. Barbara Wiltshire says:

    It is not necessarily what is ordered in court, it is more about the parent with residence failing to comply with the orders! Many resident parents, usually mother, make excuse after excuse as to why the child cannot attend the father’s contact time and no one checks out the validity of the excuses. She is allowed to cancel, delay and postpone contact to suit herself and knows she will not be penalised for it. This has to stop. There are set penalties for failing to comply with court orders and these should be implemented. It is wrong to say “we cannot jail a young mother” when it is her own choice if she breaches court orders.

  2. Steve Blake says:

    Just because the bill has been introduced does not mean it is certain of passage. We will need help to get this bill through both houses of the Wisconsin legislature and to the Governor’s desk for signing. We will be working hard but we can’t do it alone. Please go to our website to offer what help you can!
    Thanks

  3. Druk says:

    Really? A problem with a cap of $150k? May as well stop calling it child support at that point and just call it what it is: a divorce tax. If anything, $150k is way too high.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s